
An interesting audio on the problems black students have in schools. The audio can be heard by clicking here.
To provide information on issues affecting the Rock Hill School District and an opportunity for feedback and sharing of ideas. Comments are not official communications of the Rock Hill Schools or District Trustees. "Real student engagement is not about keeping students happy, boosting their self-esteem, or convincing them that what they are learning is relevant; it is about acquiring new knowledge and skills and pursuing the activities that contribute to that attainment."
Meeting of the Board of Trustees
Monday, October 26, 2009
6:00 p.m. – District Office Board Room
A G E N D A
I. Call to Order
Approval of Agenda
(Under consent agenda, all action items will be voted on after one motion and second to approve them without discussion. If a board member wants any action item discussed or voted on separately, the board member, before the agenda is approved, must ask that the action item be moved to the discussion item section.)
II. Citizen Participation
III. Special Business
A. Recognition of Rock Hill Elks Lodge for their dictionary project
IV. Consent Action Agenda
A. Approval of Minutes
1. September 28, 2009 business meeting
2. October 12, 2009 work session
B. Approval of Personnel Recommendations
V. Communications
A. Chip Hutchison, Junior Achievement of York County
B. Jeff Blair, parent on 3rd grade report cards and availability of textbooks for additional study.
VI. Report of the Superintendent
A. Announcements
B. Budget Report
C. First Year Teacher Report
D. Gifted & Talented
E. Two-Year Financial Plan
VII. Review of Work Session
VIII. Action Agenda
A. Policies IKF, IJ – 1st Reading
B. Policies GBEB, GCF, GCQA/GCQB, GDF – 1st Reading
C. Policy JCR – 2nd Reading
D. Policies JIH, JLCEE, JIHC – 2nd Reading
E. Suspension of Policy DFAC
F. Point of Sale – H.3272
IX. Other Business
X. Executive Session
XI. Adjourn
One of Google’s less popular and most useful tools is Google Alerts.
Google Alerts allows you sign-up for e-mail notifications related to any search term. I use it, for example, to track any mentions of “Mathew Needleman” (my name) or “Matthew Needleman” (the popular mispelling of my name). It’s a narcissist’s dream. But aside from the big head it may give you, it’s a good idea for any teacher to track their public persona, check for fake Myspace pages, etc.
Bloggers should also set alerts for their blogs (I find it’s more reliable than technorati for finding incoming links) and presenters should set up alerts for their presos to find out when they’re being talked about.
Knowing how to use Google well can also allow you to customize your searchers. For example, when searching for Paradigm speakers, I set an alert to search for:
paradigm site:craigslist.com
to alert me whenever Paradigm speakers were listed on Craigslist (hence the “site:” part of the search term.
In the classroom, you could use this to search for particular topics related to your curriculum. For example, searching for any timely references to fossils, physics, or medicine that may show up in particular news sources.
The alternative is to continually launch google and keep searching for this or that. Google alerts allows you to find this information instantaneously and never miss out.
For more information, see Google’s Alert’s Support Info. and Google Cheat Sheet to learn to search smarter.
What do you use Google Alerts for?
Update: Google Alerts sent me an alert about this post within 2 hours of me writing it:
Google Alerts « Creating Lifelong Learners
By Mathew Needleman
I use it, for example, to track any mentions of “Mathew Needleman” (my name) or “Matthew Needleman” (the popular mispelling of my name). It’s a narcissist’s dream. But aside from the big head it may give you, it’s a good idea for any …
Creating Lifelong Learners – http://www.needleworkspictures.com/ocr/blog/
Resources
These blogs have everything you need for your ultimate teacher’s toolbox.
Teacher Bloggers
These men and women live all over the world, teach all types of subject matter, and offer varied but excellent advice on becoming a better educator.
Technology
Love it or hate it, innovations in technology are released every single day. Learn not only how to adapt, but how to take advantage of these changes by reading the blogs below.
Subject Specific
From science to social studies, these teachers are the best of the best in their respective fields of education.
Tips and Tools
As a new teacher, you likely find yourself asking new questions every day. Go to one (or all) of these blogs for expert answers.
Special Education Emphasis
The blogs below were designed just for teachers in the realm of special education.
While these blogs may not focus solely on special education, they do contain an emphasis on the subject.
Other Educators
Librarians, professors, consultants, and others share their insight on these blogs.
News and Politics
These blogs will keep you in the know about news and politics surrounding education.
Microblogs
These Twitter microblogs are full of information, resources, news, games, lesson planning assistance, and more.
« We Are Lying to Our Children | Main
Dear Diane,
Let's explore, one by one, the separate elements of the federal education agenda, Diane. Are they based on reason and evidence or ignorance and irrationality? (I could have asked myself the same thing about our differences regarding the trade-offs and risks involved in a national curriculum.)
Merit pay is high on the list of the new business-oriented reformers and naturally difficult for unions to swallow. For unions, the big issues are above all aimed at providing employees with a fair system that won't place them at the mercy of their bosses when it comes to the basics of the job. It's obviously of less concern to people entering the field for a short period. (Ditto for retirement, seniority, maternity leave, etc.—all of which are safeguards of concern, mostly, for those in for a lifetime career.)
Merit pay involves a set of related issues of concern to me. I speak to this as a former teacher, trade unionist, parent activist, and principal. On most of these we agree, Diane, even though they have never been directly connected, as they have for me, to "self-interest."
In each of these roles, I was glad that teachers' pay benefits and seniority rights were not at stake in the disagreements we might have. I could always see how dangerous it might be if powerful parents, principals, community members, or union "bosses" were in a position to annually decide how much my own child's teacher was worth paying. Oddly enough—am I right, Diane?—most of the reforms being threatened preceded unionization of schools and exist in states in which there are no labor-management contracts. They came into existence to protect teachers from the political pressures that affected their jobs and their profession. They mirror the protections of most public employment. Union power helped to make these safeguards and benefits more secure, but their history—as you have documented, Diane—has other roots.
I'm reinforced in my attachment to these by my own personal experience and that of two of my teaching offspring! Two out of two have at some point in their teaching lives been fired, and one was blackballed. And, in both cases it was related to out-of-class behaviors: remarks made at public meetings and union activity.
But my critique of merit pay rests also on other prejudices of mine. First of all, I think schools need to be highly collegial settings and any system of financial (or other) rewards creates a setting that makes this harder, not easier to achieve. And, believe me, it's hard enough as it is. That's one reason that in NYC, the United Federation of Teachers agreed to an experiment only if the staff had the right to decide on how to spread the resulting bonus money. Secondly, I believe that schools work best when we can help young people see that the highest goal of learning is not some external reward, but the enormous satisfaction of learning, the "power of their ideas" (the title of my first book), backed by knowledge. They come to us largely untainted by a system of rewards for the most complex learning they will encounter—the knowledge and reasoning that leads them to language competence, an enormous vocabulary even under the worst of circumstances, the names and faces of thousands of objects and people, the "rules" of the game for any number of ordinary situations. They can "read" people's moods and make sensible predictions based on their theories, as they can with hundreds upon hundreds of other theories that apply to their daily lives. Learning is unstoppable—the trick is how to turn it to some "subject matter" that they don't encounter naturally, or which they don't uncover in its fuller complexity naturally. The aims of school—whatever they may be—depend on our keeping that drive alive, nourishing it, and deliberately doing as little as possible to undermine it. Ditto for teaching.
Thirdly, there is simply NO evidence on its behalf in public or private employment, and most previous attempts at this have been abandoned for that reason. The "evidence" falls on the other side. In fact, there is evidence of a lot of danger. It corrupts. Whatever is used to decide who "merits more" will—as most high-stakes indicators do—undermine the indicator(s) chosen: Campbell's law.
No better example of this has hit the headlines lately than what is known as the "C.E.O. compensation" problem. David Owen has written a startling and chock-full-of-lessons essay in the Oct. 12 New Yorker, "The Pay Problem." I'll be quoting from it in future weeks, so I hope our blogees get a copy of it. Have you read it, Diane?
To those reading us, I hope you will help me think about which of the above arguments are best or worst, and why you disagree—if you do.
Thanks, Deborah
P.S. Beware old-timers. I've just realized that the term "performance" assessment now refers to the paper-and-pencil test. As in a driver's test—who would imagine calling the paper-and-pencil test a performance test??? We're back to Alice in Wonderland where words can mean whatever we choose.
Below is the information provided by the Oconee School District and the Rock Hill School District.
From the Lucas Blog
Two-Year Financial Plan
Submitted
by
Lynn P. Moody, Ed.D.
Superintendent
October 2009
Two-Year Financial Plan
October 2009
Under the direction of the board, the administration has worked diligently to provide a financial plan for reducing expenditures over two years beginning in 2010-2011. This plan has been developed with the assumption that our revenue will remain the same and we will lose all federal stimulus funding. Below is an estimate of the difference:
$5.1 + $ 3.8 M = $4.4 M avg. pr. yr. | Stabilization – Stimulus |
$2.3 M | Budgeted Shortfall from 2009-2010 |
$1 M | Teachers’ Step Increase for 2010-2011 |
$1 M | IDEA Salaries - Stimulus |
$.1 M | Title I Salaries - Stimulus |
$8.8 million | TOTAL |
Our focus is on reducing expenditures, which is in our control. It is important to note, however, that increasing revenue is the best solution. Therefore, the board and the superintendent need to continue working with our legislative delegation to get the revenue funding changed for public education. We need more stable and reliable resources from the State. We need to encourage voters to elect politicians who stand firm on the importance of public education.
|
The Board of Trustees does have the authority to increase our local revenue by raising 6 mills each year. This assumes the growth plus the
The Board of Trustees can also choose to use the General Fund Balance. There was approximately $19M in the fund balance at the end of the 2009 school year. The 2010 school year budget anticipates using approximately $2.5M to cover expenditures. An additional $1M will be needed to offset recent cuts. This leaves approximately $15.5M. Ideally, the general fund balance should be 15% of the total budget ($19.5M) but no lower than 10% ($13M). Therefore, $2.5M could be used to offset some shortages over the next two years.
Below is list of actions we have already taken for 2009-2010 as a reminder:
· Reduced 54 school-level positions
· Reduced 13 district office staff positions
· Frozen salaries for all employees except step increases for teachers
· Delayed hiring for critical positions
· Agreed to furlough teachers 2 days and administrators 4 days
· Eliminated overtime
· Reduced mileage, professional development, and dues by 50%
· Implemented new guidelines on restricted travel for students and employees
· Cut school and department budgets by 5%
· Eliminated some student academic interventions
The ultimate goal of this plan is to cut expenditures in areas that have less effect on classroom instruction. In conversation and brainstorming sessions about this plan, we referred to the critical elements of our “Rock Hill Climb.”
· Shared Vision and Beliefs are stated in the professional code and the staff is guided by the code. The district has a strong community ownership.
· Future Focus with the 21st Century needs of the learner and effective, ethical use of technology in mind
· Nurturing environment for emotional, physical, and intellectual safety
· Quality Work Design and Delivery through collaboration, analyzing data, and providing interventions to address student needs
|
Everything on the following list affects instruction and hampers our ability to achieve our “Rock Hill Climb." Throughout our conversations and brainstorming sessions we continued to ask how this would affect instruction. Teachers and administrators provided input to the superintendent both corporately and individually. This plan synthesizes and summarizes many of those suggestions. It also assumes the flexibility options currently in place will be extended past this school year. As superintendent, I evaluated the cuts based on what I believe to be practical, fair, and realistic. Many hours of research have been put into this plan, and we are all still hopeful that it will never have to be “fully” operational.
Below is list of actions we should implement over the next two years:
· Replace critical positions in support and Operations by superintendent’s approval only. Do not replace non-critical positions when they come open. Transfer employees as much as possible to cover critical positions.
· Carefully review the status of staff employed by a letter of agreement.
· Require letter-of-agreement employees to insure with the SC Retirement System (health and dental) in 2010-2011.
· Do not replace K-12 teaching assistants’ positions when they come open. Transfer assistants as much as possible to cover mandated positions in Kindergarten and Special Education.
· Reduce 46 additional teaching positions through attrition (if possible) during the next two summers (27 elementary, 10 middle school, and 9 high school).
· Review elective offerings carefully and close low enrollment programs.
· Freeze salaries and supplements for all employees next year.
· Do not allow overtime. Emergency overtime must have the superintendent’s approval.
· Eliminate 6th and 9th grade transition day for the 2010-2011 school year.
The intent in developing this two-year financial plan is to give us a guide for future planning. It is only a tool for a specific point in time and is subject to change. For example, we received another 4% cut in EFA in September. We do not know if this will be restored. If not, it could require us to cut our expenditures another $1.5 to $1.9 M.
There are too many variables to determine this now, but this does give us some direction for where we are headed with these cuts. It also gives us the ability to use attrition as much as possible. Lastly, it goes without saying, but at some point the State of
|