Search This Blog

Sunday, June 29, 2008

How To Compare Schools?

How to compare schools is always an interesting topic. Here are some quotes
from Kitchen Table Math Blog. Go to the site to read the whole article:
http://kitchentablemath.blogspot.com/2008/06/homework-gap.html
the homework gap
from Measuring Up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us by Daniel
Koretz --

...these critics usually miss the flip side of the coin: ignoring
noneducational causes of variations in scores--that is, assuming that scores
are a direct indication of school quality--lets some high-scoring schools
off the hook. Some schools have high test scores because of the students
they serve rather than the quality of the education they offer, but those
who are convinced that scores most reflect educational quality consider them
good schools regardless. My own children attended some of the
highest-scoring schools in our state. They did indeed have some truly superb
teachers, but they also had some mediocre ones and a few I thought should
not have been allowed to teach at all, including one English teacher whose
grammatical and vocabulary errors during parents' visiting day were so
egregious that they sparked repeated and audible protests from the parents
sitting in the back of the room. Test scores were nevertheless always high,
a reflection in part of the very high education level in the community,
which was full of attorneys, physicians, academics, economists, foreign
diplomats, biomedical researchers, and the like...Not only did these parents
provide--on average--environments highly conducive to academic achievement,
but many also provided supplementary instruction, either by reteaching
material themselves or by paying for the services of neighborhood tutoring
firms.

A concrete example: when my son was in seventh grade, took a math class
that was not well taught. (I went and watched, to confirm my hunch.) One
evening he told me that he was confused by his math homework, which was part
of an introduction to probability and statistics. I first tried to clarify
the homework, but I soon realized that he was missing a few key notions. I
asked him for his class materials, looked them over, and retaught him some
of the core concepts, and after that he was able to handle the homework. I
went back to the kitchen to clean up from dinner, but he soon called me
upstairs again. He had just auditioned successfully for the school's jazz
band, and he was having trouble counting out rhythms in the piece he was
supposed to practice. I counted them out for him, but he still found them
confusing (as I had too, many years earlier, when I first tried playing
jazz). So I fetched my own horn and played the music at about half tempo
while he counted it out. That worked. As I resumed scrubbing pots, my wife
turned to me and said, "There you have it: social class differences in
educational achievement."


Disappointing scores can mask good instruction, and high scores can hide
problems that need to be addressed.

First of all, public schools are built to provide inputs, not outputs:
instruction, not achievement.

That may not have been so deadly when schools grouped kids homogeneously.
With homogeneous grouping the classroom teacher probably had a decent chance
of knowing where the kids were and of being able to teach to their level.

Along comes the de-tracking movement, and now you've got heterogeneously
grouped classrooms with kids all over the map in terms of readiness. The
inputs model hasn't changed, so teachers are told to teach to the middle, or
they're told to differentiate instruction, and when teaching to the middle
or differentiating instruction work for some of the kids but not all of the
kids, you assume the problem is the kid, not the school. After all, the
school's job is to provide opportunities to learn, and as long as you've put
PowerPoints on the SMARTBoard, you've done that.

Then add to this set-up school districts in which the vast majority of
parents are college-educated and affluent enough to hire tutors, and what do
you get?

You get "high-performing" schools where the kids are being retaught by
parents and tutored by tutors.

Friday, June 27, 2008

India Hook Elementary School in KAHNTACT

<<India Hook Elementary School.JPG>> This was in MB Kahn's quarterly
newsletter. Mount Holly Elementary will be just like India Hook
Elementary when it opens in the fall.

Jim

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Where Do You Place Your Confidence ?

This chart was in an article in today's Wall Street Journal :


[Is Sour News Good News for the Dems?]



























You can find the full article at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121443758852805303.html

A comment from the Flypaper Blog (http://www.edexcellence.net/flypaper/index.php/2008/06/the-public-schools-crisis-of-confidencea/) is interesting.  I'll leave you with it: "three times as many Americans express confidence in the public schools than in Congress. Perhaps lawmakers should remember that the next time they try to "fix" our education system".  Wish I had said it.

Jim

A Comparison of High School Seniors Over Time

http://insidehighered.com/news/2008/06/26/seniors
This information from, Inside Higher Ed,  a site I recommend you subscribe to, reports on some interesting comparisons between graduating seniors from 1974 to today.  Excerpts are below:

June 26
Senior Moments: A Look at High Schoolers Over Time

It probably won’t come as any shock to college admissions officers or others who deal with traditional college-age students that high school seniors have changed significantly over the last 30-plus years. But some of the ways in which they have changed — laid out in a new Education Department study Wednesday — may challenge the conventional wisdom a bit.

The report, Trends Among High School Seniors, 1972-2004, examines — yes — demographic, attitudinal and other trends among high school seniors at four points over three decades. The demographic data provide little in the way of surprises; they show the high school-age population growing increasingly diverse over time, with white students making up 86 percent of the national high school senior class in 1972 and declining to 62 percent by 2004.

Black Americans showed the most social mobility over this period, with the proportion of African-American high school seniors who fell in the highest socioeconomic quartile rising to 13.5 from 5.2 percent while the proportion in the lowest quartile fell to 37.1 percent from 62.8 percent. The proportion of Asian Americans in the highest quartile rose to 30.9 percent from 23.1 percent, but the proportion in the lowest quartile increased slightly over that time span, too.

Although many faculty members like to complain about the declining capabilities of incoming students, the data show that students’ have increasingly taken advanced courses in high school. The proportion of students enrolling in calculus increased to 13 percent in 2004 from 6 percent in 1982, while the percentage taking no math in the senior year fell to 34 percent from 57 percent. Twenty-five percent of seniors took advanced science courses (chemistry II, physics II or advanced biology) in 2004 compared to 12 percent in 1982, and the proportion not taking foreign languages as seniors fell to 76 percent from 87 percent.

Despite the popular perception that students are engaging in more activities (for resume padding if not out of enjoyment), the statistics suggest otherwise. While the report shows increasing numbers of high school seniors belonging to honor societies (22 percent in 2004 from 14 percent in 1972), the proportions participating in high school publications (19 percent in 1972, 16 percent in 2004), in vocational clubs (22 percent in 1972, 16 percent in 2004) and academic clubs (26 percent in 1972, 21 percent in 2004, even though the 2004 category was broader and included debate) all fell. Participation in athletics basically stayed flat, apart from a spike in 1980.

Perhaps the least surprising (but reasonably encouraging) data come in the area of the future expectations of high school seniors over time. Significantly greater proportions of seniors in 2004 said they planned to attend college (79.2 percent) and to attain a graduate or professional degree (38 percent) than was true in 1972 (59 and 13 percent, respectively).

James Heggen and Doug Ledermanb


Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Rock Hill Schools on Blogs

The Rock Hill Schools Student Engagement Conference started today (Tuesday) at South Pointe High School.  Two blogs have already posted comments, Cathy Nelson's Professional Thoughts and Ed leaderWeb.  I've provided links to those blogs from my blog site.  You should visit and check them out.

Jim

http://technotuesday.edublogs.org/2008/06/24/just-tell-it-like-it-is/

http://edleaderweb.net/blog/?p=77

Rock Hill School Board Business Meeting Notes

The Rock Hill School Board met on Monday, June 23, 2008.  Walter Brown was not there because he is recovering from surgery.  These are my notes from the meeting:

Approved by a vote of 6-0 the following promotions: Jackie Jones as Assistant Principal at Finley Road Elementary School; Laney Burris as Coordinator of Risk Management/School Safety; Carie Hucks as Asst. Principal at Castle Heights and; Gwen Lindsey as Asst. Principal at Sullivan.

Recognized Ms. Sandy Andrews on her selection as South Carolina's Adult Education Director of the Year;
       
Approved the Consent Agenda by a 6-0 vote.  Items were:
        minutes of the May 27 and June 9 meetings of the board;
        personnel recommendations;
        recommended 2008-09 salary scales for administrators, support staff, and teachers;
        overnight field trip requests from Rawlinson Road Middle School, Rock Hill High, and South Pointe High School;
        procurement code updates effective July 1;
        the cancellation of the July 14 work session of the board;
 
Bakari Rawlinson, owner and head coach of the Carolina Scorpions semi-pro football team, requested the use of a district stadium as their home stadium - no action was taken.

Supt. Moody made the following announcements:
        The Student Engagement Conference will be held June 24 and June 25 at South Pointe High School. Approximately 450 educators have registered to listen to nationally known speakers and choose from more than 100 workshops.

        A copy of the 2008-09 school calendar is now available on the district's website (http://www.rock-hill.k12.sc.us/UserFiles/rhsd3/Documents/Calendars/Calendar20082009.pdf).

        School lunch and breakfast prices will be going up for next year.  This will be an item for the July Business Meeting.         

        Summer school for high school students got under way June 23 at Rock Hill High, with Asst. Principal Darryl Taylor as director.  Preliminary enrollment figures are at 200 students, but the district is also offering additional opportunities for high school students this summer which include Virtual High School and Credit Recovery plus classes at the Phoenix Academy and Renaissance for a grand total of over 1,000 students.

        Jessica Schonberg, education reporter at The Herald, will be leaving at the end of June to return to Chapel Hill. Her replacement will be Shawn Cetrone, an education reporter with the Charlotte Observer.

Approved the proposed 2008-09 general fund budget with a 5-1 vote (Douglas against). To make up the difference between expenditures and revenue, the board approved up to a three-mil increase on non-residential property and agreed that additional revenue could be taken from the 2007-08 fund balance or the capital expense fund.


What It Takes: Mentors, Motivation, Moxie and Moms

http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/06/24/what-it-takes-mentors-motivation-moxie-and-moms/
I came across this article from "The Core Knowledge Blog" and thought it would be good to pass along because it highlights some of the things the Rock Hill Schools are trying to implement.  I also recommend you visit "The Core Knowledge Blog"  (http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/) and consider subscribing.

Jim

"Published by Leanna Landsmann on June 24, 2008 in Education Leadership, Parents and Students.

Every June we’re treated to cap and gowned seniors en route to their high-school graduations, proud families in tow. We smile and give them a ‘thumbs up.’  But we must also pause to see the drop outs as clearly as the graduates. 

One million students drop out of high school each year. The literature is packed with reasons: poverty, lack of college-bound culture at home, poor performing schools, low expectations and high pressure to reject academic success, too few great teachers and counselors. What more can the “village” it takes to raise a child do to prevent this?

As board chair of Greatschools.net, an organization that helps parents put their kids on a path to college, I stew about this more than your average Jane. After umpteen decades of ‘school reform,’ I’m angry we’re still slogging in place.

So I look forward each March to a call asking, “Do you want to review scholarship applications again this year?”  I drop everything to pour over submissions from high-achieving, low-income New York City seniors who, if chosen, will get a generous four-year free ride to college from a family foundation with a bold-face name. From several hundred applicants, three-dozen are chosen to be interviewed. From that group, the foundation selects 25. 

The bulky applications provide us with information about students’ family income, academic record, and service to community. From their transcripts and resumes we get a peek into their heads and hearts. From two required recommenders, we get a sense of students’ work ethic, values, and grit that got them accepted at some of the nation’s top universities. From the financial aid forms, we learn just how much the scholarships would matter in pulling these young people out of poverty.  And from their essays we learn they have made no small plans. They want to be teachers, doctors, researchers, environmental problem-solvers, activists and public servants. “Change the world” is a common theme.

They have stellar GPAs, high praise from teachers, and a list of achievements that many 30-something middle managers would envy.  Yet the early odds did not favor these young people. Among this year’s finalists were two students who had commuted to high school from homeless shelters. All but one was born outside the United States. Most entered schools here speaking a language other than English. Most were from single parent families; they had responsibilities for younger siblings or worked to support the family. For many, without the earned income tax credit there would be little food on dinner tables. Several suffered extreme poverty, political repression, or emotional trauma on their paths to becoming high-achieving seniors in NYC Public Schools. You cannot read these applications without a box of tissues.

Each year we wonder, “How did these students persevere when so many with so much more fail? What’s in their secret sauce? Can it be bottled for others?”

This year, I decided to study the common ingredients. They fall into categories I’ll call the four Ms: mentors, moxie, motivation, and Moms. 

Mentors: Each applicant had a strong advocate within the school; a counselor or teacher, who reminded them daily of their potential. Each participated in high-enrichment activities or internships outside of school. They benefited from such organizations as LEDA (Leadership Enterprise for a Diverse America), Jeter’s Leaders, Youth Bridge, Summer Youth Employment Program, Building with Books, Prep for Prep, Model UN, ROTC and programs affiliated with their houses of worship. Many had been prepped in middle school for challenging high school courses. They’d visited university campuses to literally see college in their futures. Guides helped navigate the college applications process.  Their mentors were force multipliers, steering them between the Scylla and Charybdis of poverty’s disadvantages and the anti-intellectualism of teen culture.

Moxie: The students who won scholarships had a full-tilt combo of energy, determination, courage, and know-how. One girl, whose losses were as painful as her dreams were hopeful, regained composure after a question that we did not know recalled a cruel memory. She paused and regained her composure more gracefully than we and continued to make her case. Others, like the young woman who presented an original poem telling us to cast away our fears, or the young man from the Middle East who outlined his plan for world peace, used the interviews to showcase their effectiveness as leaders.  From the marrow of their bones, they sent a message that said: place your bet on me.

Motivation: Teachers often find keys to students’ motivation in their resilience skills. Psychologists refer to resilience as “inoculation from the inside”. Resilience helps kids bounce back from the most trivial of slights and the most horrible of traumas. Resilience skills, contrary to popular notion, can be taught. They’re shaped by goal-setting, planning for success, and developing confidence through real achievements.  In other words, planning for success, and succeeding, brings more success. A desire for a better life helped these students set their bars high. They were motivated to take the toughest courses, get high grades, ask for extra assignments, and work at challenging jobs and programs out of school. They were determined not to allow current constraints on their lives follow them into their futures.  

Moms: When we asked, “Who is the person most influential to your school success?” these students overwhelming cited their mothers. Perhaps if more fathers were in their lives, we’d have heard about them too. But mothers who had low levels of literacy, who spoke no English, who were 10,000 miles away, who were ill and dying, who insisted that “you will be the first to go to college”, were so potent a force that they defined these students schedules and behaviors. 

This will not surprise those familiar with the work of Temple University Professor Lawrence Steinberg. When he surveyed 20,000 high school students, he discovered that a student’s academic success has as much or more to do with high parental expectations and an authoritative parenting style than income, ethnicity, or the parents’ level of educational attainment. For our applicants, each night, and each morning, there was a parent, or a memory of one, prodding them on.

Not everyone has the time or the skills to help push uphill the big boulder of district-wide school improvement.  But many of us can help bring more students through the eye of the needle. Here a few things you can do:

Volunteer to mentor. Go to PENCIL.org to find a school or program that matches your geography, or call the counselor at your local high school to volunteer directly. Make a long-term commitment to a middle-schooler or help seniors with the potential to reach college with the arduous applications and financial aid process.

Provide leadership opportunities: Many institutions and businesses offer internships to students, coach them in professional skills, and sponsor programs that range from Moot Court to enterprise development. Get involved and save these programs from budget cuts during tough economic times.

Ask two things of the from your school district: Advocate for more committed counseling staff within middle schools and high schools. And focus less on getting parents to meetings than getting them to buy into the notion that high expectations for achievement trump everything. As Steinberg notes in his report, Beyond the Classroom: Why School Reform has Failed and What Parents Need to Do, (Simon and Schuster), parenting to put kids on a path to college is a skill that can developed.

Write a check: Generously support organizations that open our poorest high-achieving students’ eyes to life outside their crowded classrooms such as A Better Chance, Breakthrough Collaborative and the Posse Foundation, as well as local programs like  Boston Scholars, Prep for Prep (New York), Ranier Scholars (Seattle), Scholarship Chicago and others.

Americans are builders and doers, but none of us alone can slow global warming, stop the slide of the dollar, or eradicate poverty. But we can invest in our low-income, high-achieving students. They’re dreaming of ways to get these jobs done.

A nationally recognized education writer and editor, Leanna Landsmann writes a weekly column for parents, A + Advice, How to Help Your Child Succeed in School. Distributed by United Media Syndicate, the column appears in daily newspapers across the nation.  "


Blog Archive

Edutopia

Subscribe Now: Feed Icon