
Tom Sparks, former Teacher/Coach/Assistant Principal at Rock Hill's Northwestern High School, and Assistant Superintendent at Lexington 3 for the past 6 years, has taken a job in Orangeburg 4. You can read the newspaper account by clicking here.
To provide information on issues affecting the Rock Hill School District and an opportunity for feedback and sharing of ideas. Comments are not official communications of the Rock Hill Schools or District Trustees. "Real student engagement is not about keeping students happy, boosting their self-esteem, or convincing them that what they are learning is relevant; it is about acquiring new knowledge and skills and pursuing the activities that contribute to that attainment."

From the Lucas Blog:
1811 – The SC General Assembly first passed a law establishing free public schools in the state.
1895 – The SC Constitution established a 3-mill levy on various properties to finance the schools.
1921 – Compulsory attendance laws required children to attend school. Interestingly, compulsory attendance was repealed in 1955 because of the Brown v. Board of Education decision. Compulsory attendance laws were restored in the state in 1967.
1930s – SC took on more of a responsibility for education and required a six-month school year (a doubling of the previous days required for schooling).
1977 – SC approved the Education Finance Act and established a defined program for public schools. The state was to assume, on average, seventy percent of the funding for local schools.
1984 – SC approved the Education Improvement Act with the sales tax going from 4% to 5%. The extra penny was dedicated to raising student performance.
1998 – SC approved the Education Accountability Act which established the “report card” system of school accountability.
1994 and 2006 – The SC General Assembly passed laws to provide relief in property taxes for homeowners which substantially altered the funding for schools. The 1994 legislation provided relief on the first $100,000 of property value, and the 2006 legislation (Act 388), created another one-cent sales tax increase to remove owner occupied property from school operations taxes.
| Judging Teachers By Test Scores | |
To be precise, states can't get funding under the $4.3 billion initiative if they have laws that bar the use of test scores to evaluate teacher performance. That includes some big states like New York and California. The administration argues that using test data to evaluate schools is essential for reform. "You cannot ignore facts," President Obama said. "That is why any state that makes it unlawful to link student progress to teacher evaluations will have to change its ways." Perhaps so. But it's worth noting that Public Agenda research has consistently found that out of all the players in education, teachers are the most doubtful about the value of testing. In 2006, we found 71 percent of teachers said students were required to take "too many" standardized tests, compared to 59 percent of superintendents. Teachers are also less likely than other groups to see standardized testing as valuable, with 62 percent of teachers calling them a "necessary evil," compared to 37 percent of parents. But these are also the very same people whose support must be enlisted if education reform is to have an impact: nothing happens in a classroom unless the teacher makes it happen. Our great challenge is holding teachers accountable while keeping them enthusiastic - - at the same time. To learn more about this critical issue, including details from our research on this subject, see the full story, "Room At The Top For Test Scores?" on our blog. And for more on education reform, check out Education Insights at PublicAgenda.org. | |