| Meeting Evaluation | ||||||
| DIRECTIONS: By evaluating our past meeting performance, we can discover ways to make future meetings shorter and more productive. Check each item "Very Good" or "Adequate " or "Needs Improvement. " If you check "Needs Improvement, " include suggestions for improvement. | ||||||
| Date: | Monday, February 10, 2014 | |||||
| 95% | Our discussion was cordial and well balanced (not dominated by just a few members). | |||||
| Comments: None | ||||||
| 95% | Participation was encouraged | |||||
| Comments: None | ||||||
| 85% | Reports were clear, well prepared and provided adequate information for decision making. | |||||
| Comments: Please provide all materials needed in advance | ||||||
| 90% | Our meeting room was comfortable and conducive to discussion and decision making. | |||||
| Comments:None | ||||||
| My favorite discussion was…….. Because….. | ||||||
| Branden Miller was very good. Update on iRock and exceptional students. Calendar - answered all questions, even the rough. iRock - we need more discussion as we progress - but the discussion was cordial and thoughtful. It was long (ORED report), but the info on the community was interesting. Branden Miller. Mildred getting a hug from Branden. | ||||||
| My suggestions for future board meetings are... | ||||||
| Value added evaluation for proposed topics for discussion. Achievement Committee to meet before March Work Session. $850 million pension liability. | ||||||
To provide information on issues affecting the Rock Hill School District and an opportunity for feedback and sharing of ideas. Comments are not official communications of the Rock Hill Schools or District Trustees. "Real student engagement is not about keeping students happy, boosting their self-esteem, or convincing them that what they are learning is relevant; it is about acquiring new knowledge and skills and pursuing the activities that contribute to that attainment."
No comments:
Post a Comment